God's moral character has been sufficiently revealed
which is why such mysterian appeals in the free will defense of hell fail
The explicit mysterian appeal in the free will defense of hell fails miserably.
Often, we'll reject logically valid arguments as otherwise unsound because a given premise will have failed, if only due simply to our rejection of some definition. For the free will defense of hell, universalists reject the notion that God's moral character has not already been sufficiently defined.
To wit:
What no eye has seen, nor ear heard, nor the heart of wo/man conceived, such are the glorious things prepared for those who love the Lord!
Mysterian appeals for the free will defense of temporal sufferings thus invoke a benevolent disproportionality between them & the weight of eternal glories! Our finite sufferings can't be weighed on the same scale with our eternal beatitudes!
HOWEVER, mysterian appeals for the free will defense of an eternal hell invoke a malevolent disproportionality between it & the weight of our finite sins? Our finite sins can't be weighed on the same scale with our eternal perdition! ???
And, no, any rejection of an infinite God is not an intrinsically infinite act. Neither could it be sufficiently free as it’s not sufficiently knowledgeable. Finally, sufficiently knowledgeable acts per a vision beatific, by definition, can’t reject God.
What no eye has seen, nor ear heard nor the heart of wo/man conceived, such are the inglorious things prepared for those who reject the Lord??? Nyet!