If Epistemology Models Ontology, then a Scotistic-Peircean Meta-heuristic Implicates a Neochalcedonian Christology & Maximian Cosmology - Part 2

in support of our Universalist sensibilities, intuitions & interpretations

As Mark Spencer has shown re divine simplicity, neither is there anything that inheres in the most fundamental metaphysical intuitions, grammars & concepts of Thomism, Scotism, Palamism or Peirce's semiotic realism to block any universalist inferences. Those are mere idioms.

Rather, the heavy universalist lifting has been done, theologically, for e.g., by the Capps, Cyril, Neochalcedonians, Maximus et al.

Thomism, for e.g., is not monolithic. There is nothing in a Semiotic, Personalist or Process Thomism that blocks universalist inferences.

Such inference blocking does not take place by one's choice of metaphysical idiom. Rather, it's located in our adoptions of theological contours, hopefully driven by such as our narrative Christologies & Patristic Trinitologies.

For example, Oliver Crisp's Deviant Calvinism gave me hope that even the metaphysical intuitions of a Strict Observance Thomism could be tweaked to be compatible with universalism. And, though Maritain did not systematically develop it from his Existential Thomism, his intuitions did not block his inferences re a putative apokatastenai. As laid out in the OP, my own Peircean sensibilities very felicitously accommodated the universalist implication's of Jordan Daniel Wood’s Maximian Cosmology.

At bottom, all great philosophers, awares or unawares, have been wrestling with the One & the Many.

This turns out not to be a paradox that resolves via discursive dialectic but an embodied antinomy that we must personally overcome existentially & pragmatically.

Some would benefit from attending to the more apophatic aspects of such Patristic formulations re perichoresis, participation, hypostasis, idiomata & person. Beyond teasing out nuanced differences from Greek & Stoic conceptions, positively, they gifted us vehicles negativa! Those inference generating & blocking contours are certainly accommodative of our theological intuitions regarding universalism.