Regarding references to our human divinity
Regarding references to our human divinity
Such references don't deny the analogy of being, participatorily, vis a vis our divine differences. Rather, they go beyond the analogia to extend its logic, perichoretically, in order to locate our divine samenesses.
Not preoccupied with our ontological inequality with God as if it was a thing to be lamented, neither would we deny the analogy of being nor mourn the relative aspect of our finite participation in Absolute goodness.
We celebrate, rather, our integral & unobliterable divine perichoretic telos, whereby we shall finitely realize the very same enjoyment that God has of Himself & Other!