Saying & Unsaying and Praying & Serving
Naming our loves has both existential & epistemic priority over explaining them.
Our theological triad necessarily engages in - not only saying & unsaying, but praying (& serving).
If we have learned anything from the Godelian-like constraints on human ratiocinations, then it is that, with both Ignatius and the Psalmist, we are to "taste and see" the truth, beauty, goodness and unity of Reality, for, however necessary syllogisms are, they are not sufficient.
Before the post-experiential processing of our episteme of participatory imaginations & long before the cognitive map-making of our doxastic propositions, our responses will begin, dispositionally, in a gnosis that's been discovered on our knees & in our embraces.
If we ever do theoretically & gnoseologically cognize reality, axiomatically (such as by dialectically resolving or paradigmatically dissolving its many paradoxes), that will likely be because we'll have, first, operatively & existentially approached its asymptotes (such as by practically overcoming its embodied antinomies).
Kataphasis & apophasis are often conceived in the West through radically logocentric lenses focused on successful ontological descriptions, participatively & analogously, aspiring to EXPLAIN othernesses.
Those strategies can also be employed perichoretically & homologously to make successful relational references, aspiring to NAME others with whom we commune in mutual loving relationships, enjoying the rewarding but ineffable experiences that come from our reciprocal giving & receiving.
A relational meta-heuristic that points toward a putative concrete social Absolute will first aspire to name the mutually constitued others with whom it coinheres in beauty & goodness. A metaphysic might, thereafter, aspire to explain the truth about their ontological properties.
Unavoidably & presuppositionally, even our fallible, inadequate & false justifications have embedded in them an implicit recognition of the true ends of human nature & thus of the true basis for our shared practical precepts.
If we ever get Trinitology right, it will be because we were gifted loving experiences of Trinitophany. If we get Cosmology right, it will have come from our experiences of Christophany.