That creature - Time

We best nuture our aporetic sensibilities for the forseeable future. There will be competing interpretations of quantum mechanics, cosmic origins, life origins, sentience origins & symbolic language origins, just for example, b/c it's hard to unscramble epistemic-ontic omelets!

What causes these aporia? Are we here methodologically thwarted temporarily, there permanently occulted, ontologically? Are we now confronted by what's indeterminable ? then by what's in/determined? both? We can't a priori say.

re time as a real, created nomological reality

see C. S. Peirce and Aristotle on Time
  ~ Demetra Sfendoni-Mentzou

In addition to Peircean thirdness, which refers to laws, habits, regularities, continuities, where time might be "primal continuity," and secondness, or brute actualities/entities, firstness refers to possibilities, but real possibilities.

Here the notion of a potential - not actual - infinite becomes indispensable for a coherent notion of time.

At some point, I think CSP will consider semiotics, subjects & signs and time to be mutually conditioning. Aristotelian?