The Indicative Universalism of a Deviant Báñezian Thomism *

* sans the theological non-starters of infallible permissive decrees, negative approbation, natura pura, antecedent - consequent will distinction applied soteriologically

The Indicative Universalism of
a Deviant Báñezian Thomism *


* sans the theological non-starters of infallible permissive decrees, negative approbation, natura pura,  antecedent - consequent will distinction applied soteriologically

Nuanced definitions of the following notions could accommodate an indicative universalism:

praemotio physica

concursus dei praevius

concursus simultaneus

predestination

unlimited atonement

irresistible divine movements

epistemically distanced volitions

original beatitude

gnomic willing

epistemically beatified volitions

theotic beatitude

essential willing

ontological volitional determinism

tropological volitional liberty

future contingent tropic acts

proleptic limited temporal elections

eschatological unlimited election

Stump's volitional distinctions of
assent, refusal & absence of refusal

Scotus' volitional distinctions of velle, nolle & non velle


I might explicate (argue) the above some day.

For now, I'm just posting this draft outline on my cyber-bulletin board.