The Inherent Epistemic Humility of Hypostatic Logic

exploring - not explaining - the antinomial, irreducible & ineffable

Hypostases remain irreducible & indifferent to - but inseparable from - natures. The mutually constituted identities of particular hypostases are grounded in differences, but only those of such opposites as have been generated by the Absolute as wholly harmonizing contraries. Each particularity thus expresses relative perfections of - without exhausting or being obliterated by - the Absolutely perfect.

This logic expresses the antinomies embodied in all hypostatic relations and recognizes that their emanational dynamics remain ineffable. It allows us to assert that all hypostases can, somehow, interact synergetically as ordered toward shared teloi. And it recognizes that we can assert that even when we don't otherwise know - not only all the whatnesses of those interacting hypostatic natures, but - all the causes of any given hypostatic thisness or whoness.

This hypostatic logic, above, applies to reality's emergentist dynamics, prior to importing notions of ontic supervenience. It's a phenomenological heuristic to explore - not a metaphysic to explain - reality's emergent aboutnesses. It takes note of them using - not ontological definitions, but - only aporetic bookmarks.

This heuristic frames up our questions regarding the hypostatic dynamics of divine paternal emanations & creational-incarnational emanations. It no less applies, with only slight modifications, to the origins of the quantum, the cosmos, life, sentience, consciousness & symbolic language.

Its practical takeaway is epistemic humility & ontological modesty. It doesn't pretend to metaphysically explain anything. It only sets some meta-heuristic contours, moreso apophatically blocking inferences, much less so prescribing one kataphatic idiom vs another.