Theopaschism & Impassibilism conceptually converge due to analogy & apophasis
What am I? That depends on what day it is!
for many theo-controversies, both sides of an issue can narrow or broaden certain conceptions, variously emphasizing certain similarities & deemphasizing certain dissimilarities between divine & created persons, and then run for the cover of analogy & apophasis to claim orthodoxy, which is fair enough
still, there's much at stake in deciding which analogies are the most felicitous, which metaphors resist collapse the longest, which idiom, in this time, at this place, among this people, can evoke the most apt response, performatively, in lifting our hearts, minds & hands to God and fostering our embrace of each & every other
as great analogies have cascaded by, then, i've found that i can earnestly be a sorrowful theopaschist on tuesdays & fridays, glorious impassibilist on wednesdays & sundays, luminously superpositioned on thursdays and joyously mysterian on mondays & saturdays
for, not even Moltmann's passibility includes all forms of suffering, not even analogously so, and others insist that impassibility excludes passions not affections